Home I Areas of Legal Practice I Mediation Process I Mediation Philosophy 

Lynn Andretta's Profile I Mediation Article I Gay Friendly Law  I Directions to Office I Contact Me I Links

 


Legal Newsroom

< Back to Previous Page

Employment Discrimination, EEOC Litigation Settlements

EEOC v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp.
(D. Colo. May 19, 2005)

In this Title VII suit, the Denver District Office alleged that defendant, a global supplier of aerospace and industrial products, subjected charging party (a machinist) and other Hispanic employees at its Grand Junction, Colorado facility to a hostile work environment based on national origin and afforded them less favorable terms and conditions of employment than non-Hispanics. Non-Hispanic supervisors and coworkers repeatedly directed ethnic slurs and racial epithets at the Hispanic employees (who numbered about 20 of the approximate 250 employees) and, with less frequency, physically threatened them.

In October 2001, an anonymous employee posted and circulated documents promoting discrimination based on race and national origin. Charging party reported numerous incidents to supervisors and to the Human Resources Department using defendant's complaint procedures. Defendant took no corrective action and the harassment of charging party escalated.

Under the consent decree resolving this case, 12 individuals will share $1.25 million in monetary relief. The decree provides that defendant will not discriminate against applicants or employees in any terms or conditions of employment based on national origin, race, or color. In anticipation of the closure of the Grant Junction plant, defendant has prepared a "General Release and Covenant Not to Sue Agreement" (agreement).

The consent decree requires defendant to remove all language from the agreement that prohibits or construes as a breach of contract:
(1) assisting another person with a charge of discrimination or a lawsuit against defendant.
(2) reapplying for employment at defendant.

Defendant must provide performance incentive earnings to its remaining employees who meet eligibility requirements (including claimants who receive relief under the decree) on a nondiscriminatory basis. The decree will expire upon closure of the Grand Junction facility or after 2 years, whichever occurs sooner.

 

 

Contact Lynn Andretta to discuss your legal options and find solutions for any Dispute or ADR related legal situations in Washington DC area or nationwide.

[ Top ]

 

 
Lynn Andretta - Mediator ADR

One Scott Circle, NW Suite 8
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: 202/265-2630
Fax: 202/265-2643
Email: Lynn@AndrettaDisputeResolution.com


Legal Areas Of Practice

  • Divorce & Child Custody
  • Workplace Discrimination
  • Employment Discrimination
  • Domestic Partnership
  • Family Law
  • Senior Citizen Law Overview
  • Small Business Disputes
  • Landlord Tenant Disputes
  • Civil Rights
  • Contractor Consumer Claims
  • Same Sex Marriage
  • Gay Friendly Law
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Uncontested Divorce
  • Prenup Agreement
  • Collaborative Law
  • Commercial Arbitration
  • Adoption

  • Washington DC Areas-If you live in these DC locations below and have a need for ADR services then contact us we are located near you.

  • Anacostia / Waterfront
  • Brookland
  • Capitol Hill Union Station
  • Cardoza / Shaw
  • Chinatown / Old Downtown
  • Downtown
  • Dupont Circle/ Adams Morgan
  • Foggy Bottom
  • Friendship Heights
  • Georgetown
  • Georgia Avenue/Takoma
  • Montgomery County, Md
  • National Mall
  • Silver Spring, Md
  • Takoma Park, Md
  • Rockville, Md
  • Uptown Woodley Park / Zoo


  • Site Map | The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.

    Copyright ©2008 Lynn Andretta - Mediator ADR
    Orion Foundry (US), Inc. – Search & MM Services. All rights reserved